Here, from an interview with Roger Friedman at Fox News on his 80th birthday:
RF: Seriously, your work has lasted. My friend still teaches a course on you in her high school.Also via the flying monkeys at Fox News: By the late seventies, Vonnegut was rich and irrelevant, the subject of other people’s books, a sacred cow of the New York literary scene One of my sharp-eyed editors passed me this dribble.
KV: It’s just like going to Las Vegas. Maybe you win and maybe you don’t. I wrote what I had to write for whatever reasons. Apparently it was my destiny to write as I have, and yes we found readers. Do I have a survivor’s syndrome after the Dresden firestorm? I have a survivor’s syndrome about all the wonderful writers I knew who ended in neglect and abject poverty.
RF: You’re thinking of people like your old friend Richard Yates [the great novelist and short story writer, author of Revolutionary Road]?
KV: Of course In one book I told about a guy who rebuilt my house up in Cape Cod. He did the whole damn thing, put the footings in and the foundation, and when I asked him how he did it, he said he didn’t know. I look at the list of books I’ve written and it’s not much of an output. I’m completely in print and how the hell I did it, I don’t know.
RF: Is there one book you’re more partial to than the others?
KV: The flagship of my little fleet is Cat’s Cradle.
And as long as I have the chance, here’s one of my favorite of Vonnegut’s acute observations, from Slaughterhouse-Five:
The visitor from outer space made a serious study of Christianity, to learn, if he could, why Christians found it so easy to be cruel. He concluded that at least part of the trouble was slipshod storytelling in the New Testament. He supposed that the intent of the Gospels was to teach people, among other things, to be merciful, even to the lowest of the low. But the Gospels actually taught this:
Before you kill somebody, make absolutely sure he isn’t well connected.
So it goes.
Out Stealing Horses by Per Petterson
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75fd4/75fd4578514c3490edc44a8fb81c0d6888f73748" alt="Book Digest"
No doubt somebody felt the sympathetic resonance of Peterson’s novel with Marilynne Robinson’s masterpiece Gilead, as she is scheduled to speak with Petterson at the PEN World Voices Festival on April 27th. Also the winner of the Independent Foreign Fiction Prize, that same newspaper said of Out Stealing Horses: looks like a charming but modest chamber piece. In retrospectand this is a novel that strikes deep and lingers longit feels more like some shattering literary symphony.
Sounds wonderful, yes?
» Read an excerpt from Out Stealing Horses
Selected Poems by Derek Walcott
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4facf/4facf245bb66babff6a8c456d4bbdc582b5e3993" alt="Book Digest"
Trying to capture Derek Walcott’s oceanic work in a formula would be an absurd enterprisehad he not himself come to our assistance, shrewdly hiding a few key formulations in his texts. His friend Joseph Brodsky lifts out one of them in his analysis of the work:Get it?
I’m just a red nigger who love the sea,
I had a sound colonial education,
I have Dutch, nigger, and English in me,
and either I’m nobody, or I’m a nation.
These lines in The Star-Apple Kingdom call to mind, in the first place, how Walcott unites white and black on his father’s as well as on his mother’s side but they also remind us of the fact that in his poetry he amalgamates material from different cultures: West Indian, African, and European.
Biography: A Brief History by Nigel Hamilton
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12099/1209984e0379095bde667fc2db409dba64271b8a" alt="Book Digest"
Naturally, one wonders to what degree the main thrust of this bookan apologia for the art of biographyis really an apologia for the art of biography as practiced by Nigel Hamilton. But in any case, he has produced a rich and provocative meditation on the history of biography, albeit one marred by an overblown central argument [he] seems almost to suggest that a decline in the quality of biography in the West led to the rise of Hitler and Hirohito. If only we’d had more incisive biographies, democracy would not have been so imperiled in the 1940s!Silly arguments aside, given the publishing onslaught of biographies, memoirs, and pathographies (thanks, Joyce Oates), tilling the genre’s fertile fields beyond the strictures of Plutarch and Samuel Johnson is, I believe, self-evidently of great value.
How I Write: The Secret Lives of Authors edited by Dan Crowe and Philip Oltermann
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7057/d70574df1d8215a1d3a2af46ac8647ef14685c78" alt="Book Digest"
Incidentally, this tome is a more lighthearted and visually exciting romp through the cornfields of literature than the Writers on Writers anthologies and the interviews published by the New York Times and the Paris Review.
Sick: The Untold Story of America’s Health Care Crisis and the People Who Pay the Price by Jonathan Cohn
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a01a/3a01a108a33f3cfe7596d9ba6dc5726b9ea592e8" alt="Book Digest"
The Unknown Terrorist by Richard Flanagan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f41c/8f41c1247643d4589391324b285025ff2bc52d53" alt="Book Digest"
» Read an excerpt from The Unknown Terrorist
Shakespeare’s Kitchen by Lore Segal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0028/a0028405ebb3d8f05eacf4a17c5c9f1d349aa8f8" alt="Book Digest"
Segal is an enchanting storyteller. An old hand at dodging sentimentalitywho else could have transformed her childhood expulsion from Hitler’s Europe into such a dry and delightful tale, as she did in Other People’s Houses?she compels our attention without ever asking for it. Perhaps that is her secret: She never does ask; she maintains a dignified distance from the reader.
Presence by Arthur Miller
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2181/d21814f97a30e3e049b4f740b597aafc2cf29b3f" alt="Book Digest"
Here, from the title story:
He wakes at quarter to six, sun in his face, still tight about being criticized for not doing enough for women, slips into walking shorts and sandals with a glance toward her exposed arm, and thirsty for the morning fog steps out into the chill, walks toward the beach road in the swirling mist, grateful even to the dimmed sun for its uncomplicated touch of warmth on his back. The row of sleeping beachfront houses and their dozing cars alongside the road, his sandals whispering, he searches for the public path down to the beach and at last finds it alongside the last house in the row. On the brow of the path before it descends he pauses for his first glimpse of the sterling ocean, his hallowed homewater from so long past in childhood, when it loved him and scared him into sparkling and foamy white on top and dark below with live things in its holy depths. Once he had nearly drowned, at six, seven. Another step now descending upon the tippy, blanched gray planks, and through the long spear grass alongside him a white body suddenly, a man in his black T-shirt seen from his overheadI hope and believe you will excuse this digression: here’s Kurt Vonnegut on Miller (and Susan Sontag).
Age of Betrayal: The Triumph of Money in America, 1865-1900 by Jack Beatty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a056/5a056e5227e86c0b91745ed6140c0ce15fd545db" alt="Book Digest"
Jack Beatty, who must be ambidextroushe is an editor at the Atlantic, a news analyst for the On Point radio program, and an accomplished authoris a skillful narrator and scholar. Here he recounts the trumping of democracy by a handful of oligarchsJay Gould, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.P. Morganwho were complicit with an oligarch-friendly Supreme Court during post-Civil War America. Beatty’s well-modulated and justifiable outrage, you must believe me, are necessary.