Another Person of Color Outraged at Some Insignificant Thing Again
On September 13, one headline read: "Chrissy Teigen bashes 'oriental salad dressing' on Twitter." A majority of the headlines follow this same tone of "another person of color outraged at some insignificant thing again." But actually, if you read Tiegen's tweets, she starts off by saying she is "really really really really clearly not a PC type of gal."
I really really really really clearly am not a PC type of gal but I'm a little weirded out at the oriental dressing option on my flight
— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) September 13, 2016
Then, under fire for not being offended enough, she criticizes people brandishing "social media buzzwords of influence" and "all the non-Asians telling me what is offensive to Asians."
This begs the question: is the term "oriental" really so offensive? Who is really offended—Asians, or non-Asians on the behalf of Asians? These two articles illustrate how nuanced the semantics of racial politics are, and when food is involved—as in "oriental dressing"—it makes the debate sound too simple and, well, a little stupid, which of course some media companies capitalize on to generate clickbait.
Back to Teigen's original point, "oriental dressing" is an awkward coinage at a time when many menus simply read "Asian dressing" to the offense of nobody. It's not some apocalyptic call to stop eating a particular salad dressing, and to imply celebrities are advocating so in headlines is not just dumb but dangerous (see: alt-right, political correctness, Donald Trump).